While I acknowledge that climate change exists and will continue to be a natural phenomenon, I don’t believe it warrants the monumental concern it’s often given. Despite alarming predictions, polar bears are thriving, the ice caps remain largely intact, and temperature fluctuations are natural occurrences. The narrative that there’s overwhelming scientific consensus on catastrophic climate change seems overstated, particularly when considering how sensationalism often drives public discourse.

My greater concern lies with global warming resulting from a potential nuclear exchange. Historically, we’ve seen similar cycles of fear—whether it was the looming threat of a new ice age, overpopulation-induced famine, or now, global warming. The pattern suggests a tendency to exaggerate and sensationalize issues. Weather, like many natural processes, follows principles of equilibrium, balancing itself over time.

Rather than bankrupting our nation with drastic measures like the Green New Deal, we should pursue renewable resources in moderation. The U.S. has built its economy on affordable, abundant energy, and while it’s important to seek sustainability, we must do so without crippling our economic foundation. Other major polluters like India, Russia, and China should also be held accountable, rather than disproportionately burdening our own economy with extreme solutions.